Legal Opinion
United States v. Aguilar
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 2, 1995No. 92 CR 1228 (JBW)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order
WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge.
This ease concerns one of a large class of federal criminal prosecutions to which the Guidelines do not, as a practical matter, apply — those disposed of by plea agreement under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(e)(1)(C). For an earlier view of this case, see United States v. Mosquera, 813 F.Supp. 962 (E.D.N.Y.1993) (describing procedures for multi-defendant prosecution).
I. PACTS
The defendant was indicted for conspiring to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). According to the government, he headed a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Rafael Pimentel, Amabledeyes Dejesus, Julio Dejesus, Juan Dejesus, Amabledeyes Dejesus, Julio Dejesus, Juan DejesusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. John Stanley, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Anne E. Cunavelis, A/K/A KikiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. William C. KemperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Percy William Fields v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Brewer v. StarcherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. Manuel Antonio Torres-Echavarria, A/K/A Manuel BaezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. KempDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1996
- Graziano v. Kaplan & KatzbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Pimental v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.