Legal Opinion

Rutanhira v. Rutanhira

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 30, 2011No. 2010-377PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. Father appeals a family division order awarding mother primary legal rights and responsibilities for the parties’ daughter based on the court’s conclusion that father exercised poor judgment in desiring to take his daughter to his birth country, Zimbabwe. On appeal, father contends that the trial court abused its discretion by considering evidence outside of the proceeding. He additionally challenges the court’s finding that he planned to leave daughter in Zimbabwe while he traveled to South Africa and claims the court erred when it considered testimony regarding his desire to travel to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. BariCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Ney v. NeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Magnoni v. Smith & Laquercia, LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  4. Siebert v. SiebertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  5. Tribbitt v. TribbittSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aron C. Vance v. Miranda LockeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. In the Matter of Tammy Rokowski and Shane RokowskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API