Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 17, 2018No. 116968PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The decision of the court was delivered by Nuss, C.J.:

Shelbert Smith appeals the district court's denial of his motion to file a late appeal. Smith argues the court arbitrarily disregarded undisputed testimony that he told his trial counsel he wanted to appeal-evidence that would help him meet an exception to the rule requiring timely appeal. See *533 State v. Ortiz , 230 Kan. 733 , Syl. ¶ 3, 640 P.2d 1255 (1982). As a result, Smith asks that we reverse the court's decision and allow his appeal to be filed out of time.

We decline to so rule. Instead, because of our concerns that the district court…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Williams v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  5. State v. PuckettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  2. In re CullinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  4. FCM Investments v. Grove Pham, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. State v. ByardCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API