Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Tammy Rokowski and Shane Rokowski

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 23, 2015No. 2014-0617PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, C.J.

The respondent, Shane Rokowski, appeals the final decree in his divorce from the petitioner, Tammy Rokowski. On appeal, he argues that the Circuit Court (Albee, J.) erred by: (1) conducting its own internet research to ascertain the value of the marital home; (2) inequitably distributing the parties’ assets and debts; (3) awarding the petitioner permanent lifetime alimony of $750 monthly; and (4) requiring him to pay certain expenses while the divorce was pending. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

I. Background

The trial court found, or the record contains, the following facts. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bean v. Red Oak Property Management, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  2. In re Estate of KingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  3. Rix v. Kinderworks Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  4. Cucinotta v. BullockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. State v. PloofSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  2. Arbay M. Osman & a. v. Wen Lin & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  3. In the Matter of Gregory Neal and Lauren DiGiulioSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
  4. In the Matter of Vivian Silva and Robert SilvaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
  5. Maria Melekos v. Wanda CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API