State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Rozin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Vice Chief Justice.
Complainant, Oklahoma Bar Association, alleged one count of misconduct warranting discipline against respondent attorney, Mitchell D. Rozin. The Professional Responsibility Tribunal (PRT) found that respondent’s conduct violated rules 1.3, 1.4(a), 8.4(a) and 8.4(c) of the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct. Instead of the thirty-day suspension from the practice of law recommended by the complainant, the PRT recommended a sixty-day suspension.
The parties entered into Agreed Stipulations of Fact and Conclusions of Law. The stipulations reflect that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ColstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. McMillianSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. PevetoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. HatcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
3Cited by52 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DorisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. McBrideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. PacenzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.