Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Rudawski
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 2, 2006No. A05-484PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) and respondent Jerome M. Rudawski appeal the supreme court referee’s recommendation that Rudawski be suspended from the practice of law for 60 days for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law while on involuntary restricted status, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 5.5(a). Rudawski was on involuntary restricted status as a result of his failure to comply with continuing legal education (CLE) repotting requirements.
Because Rudawski ordered a transcript of the referee hearing, the referee’s findings of…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against GheritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against WentzellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RuhlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against VaughtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011