Legal Opinion

Risley v. McNiece

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 6218PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this action the appellant, as plaintiff, sued the appellees, as defendants, to have a certain deed, executed to one Riley Risley by the appellant, and described in his complaint, “ set aside and held for naught.” Answers were filed by the appellees, putting the cause at issue; and the trial thereof by the court resulted in a finding for the appellees, the defendants below. Over the appellant’s motion for a new trial, and proper exception saved, the court rendered judgment on its finding against him, for the appellees’ costs.

*435The only error assigned by the appellant is the decision of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Petro v. CassidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Rush v. RushIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Doe ex dem. Petro v. CassidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Raley v. Umatilla CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Richter v. RichterIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Schuff v. RansomIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Helms v. Helms.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. Ellis v. Elkhart Car Works Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API