Risley v. McNiece
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Knox Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
In this action the appellant, as plaintiff, sued the appellees, as defendants, to have a certain deed, executed to one Riley Risley by the appellant, and described in his complaint, “ set aside and held for naught.” Answers were filed by the appellees, putting the cause at issue; and the trial thereof by the court resulted in a finding for the appellees, the defendants below. Over the appellant’s motion for a new trial, and proper exception saved, the court rendered judgment on its finding against him, for the appellees’ costs.
*435The only error assigned by the appellant is the decision of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lindsey v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Petro v. CassidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Rush v. RushIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Doe ex dem. Petro v. CassidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by9 opinions
- Raley v. Umatilla CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1887
- Richter v. RichterIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Schuff v. RansomIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Helms v. Helms.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Ellis v. Elkhart Car Works Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.