Legal Opinion

Rush v. Rush

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1872PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from the Grant Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Azel Rush made his will, by which he devised certain lands in Grant county to his wife, Sally Rush, during her widowhood. He also devised to his son, Thomas E. Rush, a portion of the same lands, at the death of the said Sally. The language of the will, in respect to the devise to Thomas E., is as follows: “ I give and bequeath to my son, Thomas E. Rush, at the death of my wife, Sally Rush, provided he takes care of her during her natural life, fifty acres,” etc., describing the land thus devised to Thomas E. Sally survived her husband some years, and, upon her death, Thomas E. entered upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Petro v. CassidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Boone v. TiptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Hoover v. HooverIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Sheets v. Vandalia Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Nagle v. HirschIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Risley v. McNieceIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API