Legal Opinion

Petro v. Cassiday

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1859PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs, brought this action against Cassiday, for the recovery of a tract of land in Fayette county. Defendant answered the complaint by a general traverse. Verdict for the defendant, upon which the Court, having refused a new trial, rendered judgment, &c.

Plaintiffs claimed title under a deed executed to them November 26, 1851, by John McCray, as executor of Phineas McCray, who died in the year 1842, leaving a will, which contains these provisions:

1. “ I will and bequeath to my wife, Sarah Me Cray, all my real and personal property during her natural life.”

2.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fowler v. DuhmeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Lindsey v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Hoover v. HooverIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Sheets v. Vandalia Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Brady v. GregoryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API