Legal Opinion

Ricky Harris v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 2003No. E1999-02771-SC-R11-PCPublishedCited by 157 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J.,

delivered the opinion of the court,

in which WILLIAM M. BARKER, J., joined.

In this appeal, the dispositive issues are whether a claim that the prosecution failed to disclose exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), is a cognizable basis for reopening a post-conviction petition under Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-30-217(a) and whether the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in sua sponte treating the petitioner’s motion as a petition for writ of error coram nobis based upon newly discovered…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Burford v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. MixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Sands v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Workman v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by157 opinions

  1. Ricky HARRIS v. STATE of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Howell v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Cyrus Deville Wilson v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Tommy Nunley v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Freshwater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2004

152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API