Lands Council v. Vaught
District Court, E.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION
SHEA, District Judge.
On March 9, 2001, the Court heard oral argument on the summary judgment motion filed by Plaintiffs, (Ct.Rec.103), and by Defendants Robert Vaught, David Wright and Mike Dombeck (“the Federal Defendants”), (Ct.Rec.109). Defendants Inter-mountain Forest Association, Idaho Forest Owners Association, and Vaagen Brothers Lumber, Inc. (“the Intervenor Defendants”) have joined the Federal Defendants’ summary judgment motion. (Ct. Rec.115.)
At the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Darby v. CisnerosSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' CooperativeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- The Lands Council v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- The Lands Council v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Wildwest Institute v. BullCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Lands Council v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Habitat Education Center, Inc. v. BosworthDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.