Legal Opinion
New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Gourdeau Construction Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 9, 1995PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The plaintiff telephone company (NET) alleged in its June, 1992, complaint that, as the result of construction work that the defendant (Gourdeau) performed at NET’S building in Nashua, New Hampshire, Gourdeau, in *659breach of its contractual obligations, caused damage to NET’s equipment. NET’s breach of contract claim, based on damage that allegedly occurred in August, 1986, is barred under a New Hampshire three-year statute of limitations, if it is applicable. N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 508:4 (Supp. 1994) (three-year statute of limitations, effective July 1, 1986 [1986 N.H. Laws c. 227, § 12]). On…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Sun Oil Co. v. WortmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Cosme v. Whitin MacHine Works, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Robidoux v. MuhollandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Pedzewick v. FoeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- Lou v. Otis Elevator CompanyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Siebe, Inc. v. Louis M. Gerson Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.