Smedley v. Capps, Staples, Ward, Hastings & Dodson
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CAULFIELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff Lauren Smedley has filed a motion for summary judgment on her Cal. Labor Code § 1101 claim. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs emotional distress claims. Upon review of the briefs and arguments of the parties in support of and in opposition to these motions, and good cause appearing therefrom, plaintiffs motion is DENIED; defendants’ motion is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part.
FACTS AND BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Lauren Smedley was hired by defendants CAPPS, STAPLES, WARD, HASTINGS & DODSON, James Allen, William Staples, John Hollingshead,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Turner v. Imperial StoresDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1995
- Fox v. Gates Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Greenwood v. Taft, Stettinius & HollisterOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- LeGendre v. Monroe CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Stuff v. SimmonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.