Rando v. California State Automobile Ass'n
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This appeal arises from a summary judgment on a complaint for declaratory relief brought by respondent California State Automobile Association (CSAA), which held that the stacking of non-owned automobile insurance coverage for bodily injury liability should not be allowed in this case. For the reasons set forth hereafter, we affirm.
The undisputed facts giving rise to respondent CSAA’s complaint for declaratory relief revolve around an automobile accident on June 3, 1977. On that date, Stephanie Ritzer Rando (Ritzer-Rando), a minor, was operating a borrowed vehicle which was owned by S.…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- American Liberty Insurance Company v. RanzauTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Government Employees Insurance Company v. SweetDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Allstate Insurance Company v. ZellarsTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- United Services Automobile Association v. DokterNevada Supreme Court · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- Farmers Insurance Group v. Stonik Ex Rel. StonikNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Stevenson ex rel. Stevenson v. Anthem Casualty Insurance GroupKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- Slack v. RobinsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Torres v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Peterson v. Colonial Ins. Co. of CaliforniaNevada Supreme Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.