Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Colonial Ins. Co. of California

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1984No. 14806PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal in an insur anee coverage dispute. The dispositive issue is whether appellant Peterson is entitled to recover benefits under both the “bodily injury” and the uninsured/underinsured motorist coverages afforded by a single insurance policy. We hold that she is not, and we therefore affirm.

Peterson suffered personal injuries while riding as a passenger on a motorcycle that collided with another vehicle. Asserting that the driver of the motorcycle had been careless, Peterson made a claim against him under an insurance policy issued by…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bond v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. United Services Automobile Association v. DokterNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Allstate Insurance v. MaglishNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ChristensenNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Sullivan v. Dairyland InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Delgado v. American Family Insurance GroupNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. MERCURY INDEM. CO. OF ILLINOIS v. KimAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Progressive Casuality Insurance Co. v. MMG Insurnace Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  4. Baker v. Criterion InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Mercury Indemnity Co v. KimAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API