Peterson v. Colonial Ins. Co. of California
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal in an insur anee coverage dispute. The dispositive issue is whether appellant Peterson is entitled to recover benefits under both the “bodily injury” and the uninsured/underinsured motorist coverages afforded by a single insurance policy. We hold that she is not, and we therefore affirm.
Peterson suffered personal injuries while riding as a passenger on a motorcycle that collided with another vehicle. Asserting that the driver of the motorcycle had been careless, Peterson made a claim against him under an insurance policy issued by…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Bond v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- United Services Automobile Association v. DokterNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Allstate Insurance v. MaglishNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ChristensenNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Sullivan v. Dairyland InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Delgado v. American Family Insurance GroupNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- MERCURY INDEM. CO. OF ILLINOIS v. KimAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Progressive Casuality Insurance Co. v. MMG Insurnace Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Baker v. Criterion InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1991
- Mercury Indemnity Co v. KimAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.