Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 25, 2004No. CR 03-914Published

1DissentTom Glaze, Justice

Today, a 4-3 divided court issues an opinion that makes a radical change in Arkansas search and seizure law. The decision is clearly contrary to prior law and the change is totally unwarranted and unnecessary. Initially, I point out the obvious mistakes the four-member court has made in its refusal to follow the Fourth Amendment, as it protects all citizens against unlawful searches.

First, the majority’s members seem to treat the so-called “knock and talk” as a brand new procedure used by law enforcement officers. Such a procedure has been around for a long time, and merely allows officers to…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Robert O. Gilmore, Jr., and Inmates of San Quentin State Prison, United States of America, Intervenor v. People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Ronald Tobin, Clifford Roger Ackerson, United States of America v. Ronald TobinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Lenin M. Jerez and Carlos M. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API