Legal Opinion
Botting v. Department of Behavioral & Developmental Services
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 23, 2003PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.
[¶ 1] Pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 80C, Tsu-la Botting appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Atwood, J.) affirming the Commissioner of the Department of Behavioral and Developmental Services’s dismissal of her grievance. In her grievance, Botting alleged that she received inadequate care when she was a voluntary patient at the Aroostook Medical Center (TAMC) and that TAMC failed to obtain her informed consent before it treated her. She contends that the Superior Court erred in determining that BDS lacked authority to review her grievance and in finding that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- Guilford Transportation Industries v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Daniels v. Tew Mac Aero Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Conlogue v. ConlogueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- York Insurance of Maine, Inc. v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Kane v. Commissioner of Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Linda J. Clifford v. MaineGeneral Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- State v. DonovanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.