Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 19, 1932No. 21799PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The question here at issue involves the construction of section 32 of the workmen’s compensation act, fixing the amount of compensation payable for specific disabilities. It is not disputed that the claimant received an injury in the course of liis employment, and that such injury has resulted in a total loss of the use of his leg, and the sole question for, determination by the industrial commission, as shown in the clear and well stated opinion by Commissioner Whitaker, was as to the amount of compensation to which the claimant was en*843titled. Prior to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Austin Bros. Bridge Co. v. WhitmireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Home Accident Insurance v. McNairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. South v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  4. Georgia Casualty Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  5. Stefan v. Red Star Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Travelers Insurance v. ReidSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Commercial Auto Loan Corp. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  5. National Surety Corp. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API