State v. Mink
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion for nonsuit. The defendant contends “that the court erred in failing to nonsuit the case based on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice . ... ” The record is replete with evidence tending to corroborate the testimony of the accomplice, Jesse Johnson. Furthermore, the unsupported testimony of an accomplice is sufficient to sustain a conviction if it satisfies the jury beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the defendant. State v. Tilley, 239 N.C. 245, 79 S.E. 2d 473 (1954) ; State v. Bailey, 18 N.C. App. 313, 196…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. PeeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- John Allen Minor v. Harold E. Black, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- John Allen Minor v. Harold E. Black, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975