Legal Opinion

State v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1973No. 736SC114PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Counsel is reminded that the rules of practice in this Court are not merely advisory, but are mandatory. Attention is directed to Rule 271/2 of the Rules of Practice, which provides in part:

“The first page of appellant’s brief, other than formal matters appearing thereon, shall be used exclusively for a succinct statement of the question or questions involved on the appeal. Such statement should not ordinarily exceed fifteen lines, and should never exceed one page. . . .

The statement of the questions involved or presented by the appeal, is designed to enable the Court, as well…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Britt v. Carolina Northern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Munchak Corporation v. Riko Enterprises, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1973
  2. In re CousinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. MinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API