Forman v. Chicago Title Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J .
In this case we hold the statute of limitations period on a title insurance policy is equitably tolled while the insurer determines *1000whether to honor or reject a timely filed insurance claim under that policy. Accordingly, we reverse a judgment based on a finding the statute of limitations had expired.
Facts and Proceedings Below
In 1987, appellant, John Forman, obtained a title insurance policy from respondent, Chicago Title Insurance Company (Chicago Title), in connection with his purchase of vacant land in the City of Bellflower. The face amount of the policy was $590,000.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Peloso v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- County of Los Angeles v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Pickens v. CoffeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mills v. Forestex Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Hydro-Mill Co. v. Hayward, Tilton & Rolapp Insurance Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Transport Insurance v. TIG InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Aliberti v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.