Legal Opinion
County of Los Angeles v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 3, 1933No. Docket No. 8115PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
A suit upon an undertaking furnished on behalf of a person charged with felony having been decided by the superior court in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant appealed.
The appellant states that the question presented is as to whether upon the record the period of limitation began to run upon accruing of the cause, of action or of the right to the remedy. The facts are not disputed. A complaint was filed on June 24, 192'5, against one Eli Stanton, who, on July 1st, was held to answer to the superior court, posted said undertaking on July 3d, was informed against on July 24th, and was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Amy v. DubuqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Port Arthur Rice Milling Co. v. Beaumont Rice MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Port Arthur Rice Milling Co. v. Beaumont Rice MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Port Arthur Rice Milling Co. v. Beaumont Rice MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Port Arthur Rice Milling Co. v. Beaumont Rice MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1913
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. United Bonding InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Weinstock v. EisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Collins v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Fosgate v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Carr v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.