Legal Opinion
Moedt v. General Motors Corp.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 24, 2002No. 1 CA-CV 02-0038PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
¶ 1 Jaeque Moedt sued General Motors Corporation for an alleged breach of an automobile warranty. The matter was settled in substance, but Moedt appeals from the attorney’s fees award, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to award her sufficient fees. General Motors cross-appeals the fee award; it challenges the court’s finding that Moedt could even recover fees pursuant to certain statutory provisions. Because the court had the authority to award fees to Moedt and the discretion to award less than the fees she requested, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶2…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Utility Automation 2000, Inc. v. Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Hyundai Motor America v. AlleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- LEVERAGED LAND COMPANY, LLC v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Ansley v. Banner HealthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Dbt Yuma LLC v. YcaaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.