Legal Opinion

Indianapolis, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1876PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPettit, J.

This suit was brought by the appellees, Ann M. Smith and her husband, Samuel D. Smith, against the appellant and the city of Crawfordsville, to recover for damage done to the real property of the female appellee, in and by the construction of the appellant’s road, its ditches and embankments.

The city demurred to the complaint for want of sufficient facts, which was sustained, thus putting the city out of the case. Proper issues were formed between the appellant and appellees. The case was submitted to the court, with a request that the court should find specially the facts and the conclusions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spencer v. Point Pleasant & Ohio R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. The Anderson v. KernodleIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. HammerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  4. Egbert v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Town of New Castle v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API