Legal Opinion

The Anderson v. Kernodle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From tbe Boone Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

The appellee filed bis complaint, as follows, in tbe Boone circuit court:

Jobn ~W. Kernodle complains of tbe Anderson, Lebanon and St. Louis Railroad Company, and says tbat be is tbe owner in fee-simple .of outlots thirteen, (13,) fourteen, (14,) fifteen, (15,) sixteen (16) and seventeen, (17,) in Rose, Harris & Longley’s addition to the town of Lebanon, in Boone county, and tbat said railroad company has unlawfully and without right taken possession of *315said real estate, and is proceeding to construct along the the south line of the same its railroad, and has appropriated to its use a strip…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Mahon v. . the New York Central Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Prather v. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. White Water Valley Railroad v. McClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Baltimore, Pittsburgh & Chicago Railroad v. LansingIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Uline v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Lasalle Realty Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Brakken v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  5. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. SwinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API