Town of New Castle v. Lake Erie & Western Railroad
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hancock Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, C. J.
— Suit by appellant to compel appellees to remove their railroad tracks from a street. The complaint in substance alleges that Locust street as originally platted *19was fifty feet wide and ran north and south from the north line of the original plat of the town of Yew .Gastle’to Broad street, which was the second cross-street south; that Locust street has been continuously, for more than sixty-five years, opened, improved and maintained as a public street of the town; that the appellees and their grantors without right entered upon the street and constructed and maintained and appellees now…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- City of Clinton v. Cedar Rapids & Missouri River RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Jorgensen v. . SquiresNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. State ex rel. City of LawrenceburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Protzman v. Indianapolis & Cincinnati RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Falender v. AtkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
- Oster v. BroeIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Manion v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.