Legal Opinion
First Allmerica Financial Life Insurance v. Sumner
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 21, 2002No. CIV.01-0034-HUPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KING, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are insurance and financial services companies that filed this action against two former employees and their new employer alleging that the fonner employees took confidential business information, including client lists and customer profile information, in violation of express contractual obligations, common law fiduciary duties and Oregon law. Plaintiffs also claim that defendants have been actively soliciting other employees to transfer employment to defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Met Life). Plaintiffs assert that as Managers…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,468 Ernest C. Hector v. Herman Wiens, Individually and Dba Wiens Feed LotCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Betty Sankovich v. The Life Insurance Company of North America and Credit Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nike, Inc. v. Eugene McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- NIKE, INC. v. McCarthyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2003
- Miller v. Kroger Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- USI Insurance Services, LLC v. AitkinDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022