Miller v. Kroger Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
The Kroger Company (“Kroger”) seeks reversal of the partial summary judgment entered in favor of Robert G. Miller. We affirm because we conclude that the non-competition clause of the employment agreement is unenforceable under Or.Rev. Stat. § 653.295.
Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we repeat them here only as is necessary to our disposition.
I
Kroger argues that the non-competition clause is enforceable because it satisfies one of the exceptions provided for in Or. Rev.Stat. § 653.295. We review grants of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there exists a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Glenn K. Jackson Inc., Dba Jackson & Donahue Glenn K. Jackson v. Richard Roe Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & JamesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Robert D. Reese, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-3rd-Party-Defendant-Appellant v. The Travelers Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-3rd-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee, and the Travelers Insurance Company, Third-Party-Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellee v. Joseph R. Tomlinson R. Stephen Somogye Gary Mrazek, Cross-Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Pacific Veterinary Hospital v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.