Legal Opinion
NIKE, INC. v. McCarthy
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 29, 2003No. CIV. 03-1128-MAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
MARSH, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed this action against a former employee seeking temporary and permanent injunctive relief prohibiting defendant from maintaining employment with Reebok, International. Plaintiff seeks specific performance of a written covenant not to compete. On August 26, 2003, I granted plaintiffs motion for a temporary restraining order. On September 23-24, 2003, an evidentiary hearing was conducted on plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction. On September 24, 2003, I granted plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. The following constitutes…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sardi's Restaurant Corporation, Sardi's Restaurant Services, Inc., and Vincent Sardi v. Lyle Sardie and Western Pubs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Rodeo Collection, Ltd. v. West SeventhCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Ikon Office Solutions, Inc. v. American Office Products, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2001
- Ikon Office Solutions, Inc. v. American Office Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- First Allmerica Financial Life Insurance v. SumnerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nike, Inc. v. Eugene McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Miller v. Kroger Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Pettibone v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2003