Peake v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
MIRABAL, Justice.
The Court of Criminal Appeals has remanded this case for further consideration of appellant’s remaining points of error. Peake v. State, 755 S.W.2d 541 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1988) (Peake I), remanded, Peake v. State, 792 S.W.2d 456 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (Peake II).1
Appellant was convicted by a jury of indecency with a child. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 21.11(a)(1) (Vernon 1989). The jury also assessed his punishment at 12 years confinement and a $5,000 fine. We reverse and remand for a new punishment hearing.
On direct…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Gabriel v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Peake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Peake v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.