Legal Opinion

Peake v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 27, 1991No. 01-87-00590-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

MIRABAL, Justice.

The Court of Criminal Appeals has remanded this case for further consideration of appellant’s remaining points of error. Peake v. State, 755 S.W.2d 541 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1988) (Peake I), remanded, Peake v. State, 792 S.W.2d 456 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (Peake II).1

Appellant was convicted by a jury of indecency with a child. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 21.11(a)(1) (Vernon 1989). The jury also assessed his punishment at 12 years confinement and a $5,000 fine. We reverse and remand for a new punishment hearing.

On direct…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Gabriel v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  4. Peake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Peake v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marcum v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  2. Fonseca v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  3. Perez, Alejandro v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  4. Perez, Alejandro v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API