Legal Opinion
Worthington v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 5, 2002No. 02-5126PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
James L. Worthington appeals from a judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“CFC”) granting the Government’s motion for summary judgment on Mr. Worthington’s claim for back pay pursuant to the Federal Employees Flexible and Compressed Work Schedules Act (“CWSA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 6127 et seq. (2000), and to the Back Pay Act (“BPA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 5596 et seq. (2000). Worthington v. United States, 41 Fed. Cl. 181 (1998). Because the court correctly determined that the Government was entitled to judgment on the record as a matter of law, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
This claim for back pay has…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jewell M. Hart v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Glass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Transclean Corporation, James P. Viken, Jon A. Lang, and Donald E. Johnson v. Bridgewood Services, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Oceanic Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Annette E. Jones Norman Sampsonwayne Randolf Scott, Roland Simmons Hazella Thornhill, Sidney Wallace, Anthony Williams, Michael Yahko, for Themselves and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Housing Authority of the City of SlidellUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Housing Authority of the City of SlidellUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020