Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Automobile Drivers & Demonstrators Union Local No. 882 v. Department of Retirement Systems

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1979No. 45706PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

This is a direct appeal from a King County Superior Court judgment pursuant to RAP 4.2(a)(2). The. Department of Retirement Systems (Department) seeks review of a decision declaring RCW 41.26.030(3), which defines the term "law enforcement officer" to be unconstitutional insofar as it excludes Port of Seattle (Port) police officers from the Law Enforcement Officers' and Fire Fighters' Retirement System (LEOFF). We reverse.

*417Respondent, Automobile Drivers & Demonstrators Union Local No. 882, is the collective bargaining representative for Port police officers. The jurisdiction of the Port police…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Childers v. ChildersWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Hartman v. Washington State Game CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Roza Irrigation District v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Port of Seattle v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1982

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API