Legal Opinion

McWilliams v. Los Angeles Transit Lines

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1950No. Civ. 17739PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

—Prom ajudgment in favor of defendant after trial before a jury in an action to recover damages for personal injuries received in a collision between a streetcar and an automobile, plaintiff appeals.

Facts: After the jury had been empaneled to try an action for damages resulting from the alleged negligence of defendant, whose streetcar collided with an automobile in which plaintiff was riding, the foreman of the jury, Mr. Kroesche, read certain books on the subject of engineering which he had in his own private library. The information which he obtained therefrom, relative to the cohesive…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Noble v. Key System, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. People v. WillisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Woods v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Snoffer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Pacific Solvents Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Newman v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Kearns v. HallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  3. Murphy v. County of LakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Watson v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Markaway v. KeeslingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API