Legal Opinion
Noble v. Key System, Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 13, 1935No. Civ. 9682PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, J., pro tem.
Primarily this appeal involves the definition of the word “intoxication” as used in section 141% of the California Vehicle Act. The purpose of the section is to advance the safety of travel on public highways, and to protect the operator of a vehicle from the payment of damages resulting from an accident due to a failure to use ordinary care toward a person who accepts a ride without giving compensation therefor. The section provides that the person responsible for the operation of a vehicle is not relieved of liability for an injury or death proximately resulting from the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. MilnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Paulsen v. McDuffieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Provins v. BevisWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Belli v. Roberts Brothers FursCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Cole v. RidingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Bay Guardian Co. v. New Times Media LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.