Legal Opinion

Guardianship of Rutherford

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 1961No. Civ. 6337PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

The primary question for determination on this appeal is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the finding of the trial court that an unwed mother, who had placed her baby daughter for adoption, had abandoned her child within the meaning of the provisions of section 1409 of the Probate Code.

The minor, Baby Girl Rutherford, was born out of wedlock on September 14, 1958. Her mother, the appellant herein, was 23 years of age; prior to the baby’s birth was concerned about giving the baby a name and also about the effect which knowledge of her condition would have upon her parents; had…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Matter of CozzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Guardianship of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Guardianship of SnowballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Matter of ForresterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hendricks v. CurryTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Tulare County Welfare Department v. Carolyn M.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. San Diego County Department of Public Welfare v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Polk v. PolkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. In Re ConrichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API