Legal Opinion

In Re Conrich

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1963No. Civ. No. 20993PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

221 Cal.App.2d 662 (1963)

In re JAMES CLARK CONRICH, a Minor. RUTH THOMAS, as Deputy County Probation Officer, etc., Petitioner and Respondent,

v.

ZENE V. JASAITIS et al., Objectors and Appellants.

Civ. No. 20993.

California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. Three.

Oct. 30, 1963.

Robson, Malott & Pedder and Arthur Lyle Robson for Objectors and Appellants.

John A. Nejedly, District Attorney, and Stanley K. Dodson, Deputy District Attorney, for Petitioner and Respondent.

DEVINE, J.

This is an appeal from an order declaring a minor child free from the custody and control of both of his parents. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matter of CozzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Horr v. CattaliniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Anderson v. GanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Marr v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Jones v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Lisa R.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Tulare County Welfare Department v. Carolyn M.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. In Re MorrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Department of Adoptions v. Daniel G.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. In Re Cheryl E.California Court of Appeal · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API