Legal Opinion
Troise v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 17, 1990No. 245-88CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This case is before the court after argument on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiff’s cross-motion for partial summary judgment. Of the many issues raised by the cross-motions, the principal issue that can be resolved is whether the Government’s assessment of liquidated damages against plaintiff after plaintiff failed to complete contract performance on schedule is void as a penalty despite the Government’s correcting the method of calculation before assessment.
FACTS
The following material facts are undisputed, unless otherwise noted. On September 20,…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Miller Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- PHT Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Essen Mall Properties v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Riggs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Dufau v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.