In re the Estate of Palega
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Frankenthaler, S.
In this discovery proceeding the administratrix seeks to recover the assets of a window cleaning business. Respondent, son of decedent, claims title as surviving partner to one half of such property. Respondent’s defense of loches is dismissed.
The certified copy of the certificate of partnership filed pursuant to section 440 of the Penal Law raises the presumption that decedent and respondent became partners as of March 5, 1953 (Penal Law, § 440, subd. 6). This presumption was not overcome by the proof offered at the hearing. As a result there is no jurisdiction in this court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Estate of LichtblauNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- Hillock v. GrapeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Van Voorhis v. WebsterNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- In re the Construction of the Will of LutzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952
- Summa v. MastersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of SachsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
- Satnick v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978