In re the Estate of Lichtblau
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Henderson, S.
This is a discovery proceeding. The answer is a general denial, and there is an affirmative defense that a partnership existed. The respondent, an attorney, is the sister of the decedent. The decedent was also a lawyer. Until November, 1925, he was practicing law individually. At about that time the respondent engaged in the practice of law from the same offices that the decedent had formerly occupied solely. There is considerable documentary evidence bearing on the question as to whether there was a partnership. On November 12, 1925, there was a signature card filed with a bank…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Claim of Raymond v. Estate of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Williams v. . WhedonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Sargent v. . McLeodNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- In Re the Estate of HeinzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- In re the Chemical Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Roe v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- In re the Estate of KalikNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942
- In re the Accounting of Public Administrator of King CountyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
- In Re the Estate of JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Whittier v. AtkinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.