Legal Opinion

Van Voorhis v. Webster

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term, Monroe county. Action by John Van Voorhis against Hawley E. Webster, Ella A. Webster, and Hannah F. Brown. From an order denying a motion to vacate a warrant of attachment, Charles E. Bostwick, as receiver of the firm of H. E. Webster & Co., appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

The defendant Hawdey E. Webster, by means of false representations, obtained of the plaintiff $500, on the credit of his firm of H. E. Webster & Co. Afterwards, on September 27, lS9á, this action was commenced, and the warrant of attachment issued therein was levied upon partnership" property of the defendants, composing such firm. On the following day, in an action for the dissolution of the firm, etc., Charles E. Bostwick was appointed receiver of the partnership assets, and his motion to vacate the attachment was shortly thereafter made. The grounds recited in it are that the defendants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Continental National Bank of Boston v. StraussNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. National Bank of Salem v. . ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Fifth Avenue Bank v. ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Hayes v. ReeseNew York Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Mowbray v. LawrenceNew York Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BrandtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. In re the Estate of PalegaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1955
  3. Quinn v. ReedNew York Supreme Court · 1914
  4. People ex rel. Anilin v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. People ex rel. Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API