Hillock v. Grape
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, John Grape, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in ■ the office of the clerk of the county of Monroe on the 28th day of* September, 1905, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Monroe Special Term.
1Opinion of the Court
Nash, J.:
■This is -an action to establish a copartnership and for an accounting. .The copartnership is denied. The complaint alleges that on or about the 1st day of March, 1901,;at the city of Rochester, H. Y., the plaintiff and .defendant entered into a general trucking and carting copartnership, each to be an equal partner therein, the firm name to be Grape & Hillock, and the assets of the firm at the first were to consist of four horses and two wagons put into said business by said Grape, agairist the knowledge and experience Hillock. *721had of and in trucking and carting business, they to…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Schymanski v. ConventzAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Resolute Fire Ins. Co. v. O'RearAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
- In re the Estate of PalegaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1955
- Quinn v. ReedNew York Supreme Court · 1914
- Christal v. PetryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.