Legal Opinion

Rotelli v. Catanzaro

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 6, 1996No. 94-697-AppealPublishedCited by 176 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEDERBERG, Justice.

This case illustrates the problems that can arise when documents executed in the course of a single transaction are discordant. A promissory note and a disbursement agreement, both signed in conjunction with the sale of a partnership, reflected conflicting understandings of when the promissory note became payable. The trial justice granted summary judgment to the plaintiff, Peter J. Rotelli, and the defendant, Robert S. Catan-zaro, appealed to this Court. Because we conclude that the two instruments are ambiguous on the critical question of whether the promissory…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Accent Store Design, Inc. v. Marathon House, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  2. Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart Corporation, Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  3. Hydro-Manufacturing, Inc. v. Kayser-Roth Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  4. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. Dial Media, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  5. Mallane v. Holyoke Mutual Insurance Co. in SalemSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by176 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. State Crime Laboratory CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  2. Zarrella v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  3. DeMarco v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  4. Plunkett v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  5. Gorman v. GormanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005

171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API