Legal Opinion

Hill v. United States Board of Parole

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 1966No. Civ. A. 9567PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

FOLLMER, District Judge.

Reid Tucker Hill, an inmate at the United States Penitentiary, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, has submitted a document entitled “Petition for a Writ of Mandamus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651. In Forma Pauperis 28 U.S.C. § 1915.” A similar “Petition” was dismissed because it failed to state any facts from which it could be determined if there was any merit to the action. Hill v. U. S. Board of Parole et al., Civil Action No. 9460 (M.D.Pa. Decided July 1, 1966, unreported). Hill has now added some factual allegations to support his contention that he was wrongfully…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hedrick v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  2. Orlando W. Hodge v. T. W. Markley, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Terre Haute, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  3. Application of JamesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  4. McMillan v. ParkerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Schillinger v. United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, WashingtonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1966

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. NakaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  2. Hamilton v. NakaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  3. Guffanti v. HersheyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  4. Toles v. KatzenbachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  5. Swift v. CicconeDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API