State v. Chavis
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of armed roberry and sentenced to twenty (20) years’ imprisonment. He alleges the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict, which was based upon the lack of evidence of appellant’s presence at the scene when the crime was committed. We disagree and affirm.
Appellant met with three other men to plan the robbery of Sansbury’s Grocery Store in Oates, South Carolina. He supplied two of the conspirators with sawed-off shotguns, masks, and gloves, and shortly before the robbery he drove them to the scene. After “checking out” the store, the three men…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- State v. GilbertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
- State v. HamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- State v. BLACKWELLSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. LeonardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Young v. CatoeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- In re McGeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- Paul Mazzell v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections Travis Medlock, Attorney General, State of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.