Legal Opinion
State v. Hill
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 13, 1977No. 20400PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
Appellant was convicted of armed robbery and sentenced to twenty-five years imprisonment. We find no error in this trial and affirm.
Appellant contends his constitutional rights were violated because no preliminary hearing was held. It is conceded that the demand for a preliminary hearing was not made to the proper magistrate. Having failed to comply with § 43-232, Code of Laws, 1962, appellant waived his right to a preliminary hearing. State v. Taylor, 255 S. C. 268, 178 S. E. (2d) 244 (1970).
Appellant next asserts error in the refusal of the trial judge to grant writs of habeas…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Lundy v. Lititz Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. BlackburnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- State v. YatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
- State v. HymanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- State v. MattisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.