Legal Opinion

In re Bleakley

New York Court of Chancery

Decided July 7, 1835PublishedCited by 17 opinions

This was an application, on the part of A. Blpakley, to compel the payment of the amount of a judgment collected for him on a creditor’s bill in this court, against John White.

Read the full summary

This was an application, on the part of A. Blpakley, to compel the payment of the amount of a judgment collected for him on a creditor’s bill in this court, against John White. From the petition of the complainant, it appeared that in February, 1839, he recovered a judgment against White, in the supreme court, for $338,18 ; and that L. Webb, one of the solicitors of this court, afterwards' applied to Bleakley to purchase the judgment, and offered to give him $50 therefor, and take the risk of its collection. This proposition Blealdey declined ; but „ offered to give him one half of- what…

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The counsel, in whose hands the $50 still remained at the time of the service on him of the petition and notice of this application, has made himself personally ^responsible to the petitioner for that amount, by paying it over to the solicitor, after he was fully apprised of the legal and •equitable right of Bleakley to that sum, as well as to the residue of the fund already paid over to the solicitor. The peti7 lion distinctly states the grounds of the petitioner’s claim, and prayed that the counsel, or solicitor who had received the money, might be ordered to pay it over to…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bowling Green Savings Bank v. . ToddNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Boardman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  3. Ricker's PetitionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1890
  4. Backus v. ByronMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Wilkinson v. TildenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1883

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API