Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Mueller

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 11, 2007No. 57592-9-IPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Cox, J.

In Washington, all property acquired during marriage is presumptively community property.1 Spouses may by contractual agreement change their community property into separate property.2 However, to recognize any such agreement, our courts have required clear and convincing evidence to overcome the heavy presumption of its character as community property.3 The name under which the property is held does not determine whether the property is community or separate.4 Moreover, and subject to limited statutory exceptions, either spouse may manage and control community property with a like…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hollis v. Garwall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Bland v. MentorWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. In re the Marriage of BrewerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In re the Marriage of SchweitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of KileCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Damian Schwarz v. Susan M. SchwarzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. In re the Marriage of ValenteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Estate Of: Randall J. Langeland. Janell Boone, App. / X-res. v. Sharon Drown, Res. / X-app.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. Finch v. WiederCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API