Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Hogen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2019No. 20180325PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jensen, Justice.

[¶1] Susan and Marby Hogen, as purported interested persons, and Rodney Hogen (collectively "appellants") appeal from probate court orders settling the Arline Hogen Estate and discharging Steven Hogen as personal representative of the Estate. The appellants generally argue that the probate court did not have jurisdiction to enter an order for the complete settlement and distribution of the Estate and that the court lacked authority or abused its discretion in requiring Rodney Hogen to pay from his share of the Estate property all attorney fees incurred by the Estate after this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. ZiebarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Strand v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. First Trust Co. of North Dakota v. ConwayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re Estate of DionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. N. D. Private Investigative & Sec. Bd. v. Tigerswan, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Brossart v. JankeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Matter of Hogen Trust BNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Estate of EwingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Estate of EwingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API