Legal Opinion

N. D. Private Investigative & Sec. Bd. v. Tigerswan, LLC

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2019No. 20180338PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VandeWalle, Chief Justice.

[¶1] The North Dakota Private Investigative and Security Board appealed, and TigerSwan, LLC and James Reese cross-appealed, from a judgment dismissing the Board's request for an injunction under N.D.C.C. § 43-30-10 prohibiting TigerSwan and Reese from providing private investigative and security services without a license. TigerSwan and Reese also appeal from an order denying their motion for sanctions and attorney fees. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the injunction or the motion for sanctions and attorney fees, we affirm the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dahms v. Nodak Mutal Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. MinerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  3. Alerus Financial, N.A. v. ErwinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State Ex Rel. Medical Licensing Board v. StetinaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Kuntz v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Orwig v. OrwigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Guardianship and Conservatorship of S.M.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. McDougall v. AgCountry Farm Credit Services, PCANorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Brossart v. JankeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Northwest Grading, Inc. v. North Star Water, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API