Mee v. Sley System Garages, Inc.

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The facts in this action of assumpsit are very similar to those in the case of Wendt v. Sley System Garages, 124 Pa. Superior Ct. 224.

The bailor herein, on the afternoon of April 27, 1934, drove his car into the samé open parking lot involved in the Wendt case, operated by the bailee, the appellant herein, and received a check or receipt, which set forth that the bailee was “Not responsible for fire or theft. All valuables must be checked.” About 4 o’clock the same day the bailor returned and learned that his automobile had been stolen. It was recovered the next day,…